Learn about the Skin myths you listen every day. The latest version of medical myths focuses on the skin. In the wrong judgment, we covered black balm, sunscreen, and chocolate, the so-called cellular skin acne.
Our skin has many parts. For example, it helps to keep our internal parts inside and prevent bacteria from passing through. It can also help us stay warm when it’s cold and cool down when it’s hot.
Although this organ has a wide range of physiological functions. It seems to be the largest organ in the body, although some rodents can collide. The skin is also our most prominent organ. In addition, because it is so clear, the skin has also become a target organ for multiple elements. For many reasons, it ensures clearer, better, and younger-looking skin.
For many of us, skin is a perfect example of our face, no wonder magicians, experts, and crooks are so concerned.
With such sensational and insightful mixed drinks and various physiological effects, it is no wonder that the public’s opinions on dermatology are a mixture of illusions and misunderstandings.In this article, we will study 12 misconceptions. This passage helps us fight between reality and fiction and for this, we hired three experts:
Professor Hywell C. Williams, OBE, Ph.D.: Member of the Academy of Medical Sciences.
Dr. Derek Phillips: Dermatologist and representative of the British Skin Foundation.
Dr. Beth G. Goldstein: Founder of the Central Dermatology Center.
1-Expensive skin creams can keep your skin “young” forever
The skin cream industry is amazing. For example, in the United States, from April to June 2020, the Department of Excellence skin health transactions totalled US$1.1 million. It also shows an 18% reduction as compared to the 2019 product. Professor Williams revealed that basic creams can achieve significant results. Creams containing retinoids can improve the effect of photoaging. Dr. Goldstein told us that 90% of skin maturation is caused by light damage. Therefore, all creams that claim to prevent wrinkles and maturation are not enough.
In the arrangement, Dr. Phillips said, The main way to prevent reactions is to use sunscreens with broad-spectrum UV coverage. He also specifically pointed out, “These are not necessarily expensive.”
2.Drink water to keep your skin hydrated
This is a misleading warning. As Professor Williams pointed out, drinking water just keeps the skin hydrated, just like water keeps the body hydrated. Dr. Goldstein said that there is no evidence that drinking water directly affects the skin unless it is within a certain range, for example, heat stroke or dehydration.
3.Antibacterial cleansers are better for the skin.
This is a dilution. Normal skin’s microbiome helps in maintaining healthy skin. Professor Williams explained, using antibacterial cleaners will disrupt the normal balance of your skin. Compared with non-party pH cleaners, they are also more irritating to the skin.
Dr. Goldstein added, The systematic elimination of large and terrible microorganisms is usually not the best idea unless you work in medication, nutritional care, or obviously during a pandemic.
4. A dirty face is easy to peel off
In the expert evaluation of Professor Williams, this is an “impostor”. He explained that unless the ground is contaminated with hypothetical substances, such as hair oil, slippery cosmetics or oil holes associated with the word. Standard soil will not cause dermatitis or acne.
Dr. Goldstein explained: The rash is caused by accidental contact of chemicals with the skin, not dirt. People use cleansers, toners, and many products to clean their faces to treat or prevent dermatitis, but it tends to aggravate keratin, a protein made by skin cells, not soil. Digging deeper into finer details, Dr. Phillips revealed to MNT that although people with different rashes and people without rashes may have different skin microbiomes, this is not a hygienic reason.
In addition, add an interesting note about the current skin condition: Last year, the outbreak of cellular skin diseases increased. People will have dermatitis plaques wherever they press their phones. It is believed that it is identified by a mixture of obvious short-frequency light emitted by the phone, sweat, dust, heat, weather, and microorganisms on the outside of the phone. Frequent cleaning of the phone screen can prevent flares. “
5. Chocolate causes dermatitis
In essence, Professor Williams wrote, this is “another imagination.” For the above reasons, there is no premise for telling the truth.
6. All exposure to the sun is terrible to the skin.
Professor Williams explained: All sunlight openings cause a certain degree of light damage, but some sunlight exposure is necessary to enhance the binding of nutrient D, especially for people far away from the equator. The sunken dark skin is open to the sun. It has soothing properties and is valuable for certain skin diseases, such as psoriasis, dermatitis, and itching.
In any case, he also explained that the benefits should outweigh the risk of skin malignancies. And we know that this is directly specific to white people who are open to ultraviolet radiation. He recommends using sunscreen, wearing tight clothing, and staying in the shade between 11 am to 3 pm on bright sunny days.
Dr. Goldstein states that In the United States, about 5,000,000 new tumors are treated each year, and skin malignant growth is pandemic. Most of these malignant tumors are caused by exposure to the sun.
Although D nutrients are essential, he explained that we can also get them from food sources and supplements. One in five Americans will develop malignant tumors on the skin, and melanoma will become the most common in men. The disease is second only to breast malignancies in women by 2040.
7. The tan splash can prevent ultraviolet rays.
Tanning in the shower does not prevent sun damage unless it has extra UV protection. Professor Williams said, Simply spraying color on the skin does not protect against ultraviolet light. Dr. Phillips repeated this message: “They do not provide any insurance against UV rays and should not be used as a different option from sunscreen.”
8. E nutrient removes scars
In the long run, many researchers have discovered whether E-nutrients can reduce the presence of scars, but our experts’ response is consistent. Professor Williams said that at this point, the evidence was “not convincing.” Dr. Goldstein agreed, “Current information does not support the use of nutrient E to help remove scars.”
9. ‘Regular’ items are better for the skin
“Natural products may have similarities, but many side effects have also been clinically tested. They may not be as strong and may be adversely affected by stability issues. However, this is a personal decision. If people like “normal”, “sensitive” or “safe”, and they need to pay for the item, it depends on them.
Dr. Goldstein said, “Poison ivy is completely natural, but it does not rub the skin completely. In addition, he explained that in any case, completely natural elements can produce true natural effects. Most importantly, as Dr. Phillips pointed out, natural fixation, especially a large amount of fixation, can cause allergies and change the skin.
10. Wounds need air to heal.
This is a long-standing and inevitable myth, however, Professor Williams succinctly pointed out it as a mistake. As wounds heal better in damp, perfect weather.
Dr. Goldstein explained in his book “Understanding”, in the initial stage of recovery, cells are better at starting and continuing to recover in wet weather.
11. Exfoliation is fundamental for solid skin
Skin exfoliation is the way toward eliminating dead cells from the outside of the skin. This can be accomplished by utilizing a shedding instrument, a granular surface, or synthetic compounds. It’s well known but peeling isn’t fundamental. As Prof. Williams disclosed to MNT, “the skin feels smoother in the beginning, however, rehashed peeling is harming the regular skin obstruction.”
12. The dark ointment is a protected therapy for skin malignancy
Over the years, alleged dark balm, a subsidiary of the bloodroot plant, has entered the commercial center. Corrupt organizations market it as an approach to treat skin disease. Truly, dark ointment can be risky.
Prof. Williams disclosed to us that “sanguinarine — the dynamic fixing in the dark ointment — can cause serious tissue putrefaction and may not kill all skin disease cells. Continuously see a dermatologist to get suspected skin disease analyzed appropriately first and examine treatment alternatives on the off chance that, affirmed.
He additionally sent us a connection to a new articleTrusted Source examining dark balm. The creators clarify that clinical information concerning the adequacy of bloodroot fundamentally comes from contextual analyses with troublesome results including patients who self-treated with bloodroot-containing dark balms.
However, Dr. Goldstein mirrors these discoveries, clarifying that “I have seen miserable results of individuals attempting this therapy.” She additionally emphasized that dark balm harms solid tissue without adequately relieving malignancy. Dr. Phillips affirms the unfortunate results of dark ointment: “The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has listed trusted Source dark balm as a phony disease fix, and it ought to be stayed away from!”
Even though we have just started to expose skin dilutions, we trust that this goes some way in reviewing the harmony among fantasies and truth in dermatology.
Since the makeup business is an authentic behemoth, prepared dermatologists battle to coordinate with their infiltration into the public mind. This shockingly makes skin-based fairy tales hard to believe.